I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is 50 bullets. But I really want to locate a bullet in the one hundred sixty class that my more mature rifle likes.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimensions, as a result, the designation SC or short Slice. The shorter, much more compact kernels enable the powder to movement from the powder measures more efficiently, helping to ease the constant chopping of granules.

The most obvious induce is usually a rough/ruff bore. No level of copper fouling reducing agents in the powder will almost certainly proper this.

Minnesota H4831SC is my go to within the 7mm Rem Mag, but I'm saving the very little I have still left for tumble 2021. I'd start out small and function your way up, dependant upon what load data you evaluate for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.

Alaska The sc loads up a bit greater but they are the exact same matter, 1 is just small Reduce. I’ve even blended the normal one particular with the SC and gotten the identical effects as using a single or the other.

Any load data to support that? My 1st thought is it's actually not intending to burn up many of the way and velocities is going to be gradual and all over. Might be a pleasant fireworks Display screen!

Everyone loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the effects, any data you may share? Also needs to point out I've some ELD-X 175's I want to take a look at out, if you have information on that also.

Im beneath the comprehending I want to use h4831sc. I've read through that these powders are identical Moreover the shorter grain dimension of your sc. Need to I nonetheless be looking out for h4381sc?

Together with the shorter Lower version powder comes as many as The bottom of the reduce shoulder so I still have lots of room.

Liberalism; The difficult yet acknowledged Idea that it's totally probable to choose up a turd from the cleanse end.

Operate your load up with the particular powder (sc or standard) and h4831sc load data whole lot you might be making use of although. Same melt away fee doesn't suggest it'll behave "exactly" the same. I have observed more than a hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

The "SC" stands for Shorter Lower. I haven't observed a distinction between either powder dut I don't Imagine I'd combine them.

A lot of the old Lyman data just shown IMR 4831, which was surplus military powder and now newer mfg as H4831.

I sawed one in half to see how thick the jackets were, they usually ended h4831sc load data up quickly two times as thick being a 50-grain hollow stage was. Ditto for the sixty four-grain Electric power Position, as these bullets are created for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know every thing I know about h4831sc the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I don't know anything at all whatsoever about the 223. I question that you're going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let's understand how it goes.